US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel addresses the House of Representatives in Washington on Wednesday.© AFP 2013/ Jim Watson
- US Senate Committee OKs Military Force Against Syria
- US Senate Committee Authorizes Military Force Against Syria
- Moscow Says US Strike on Syria Threatens Nuclear Security
- Kerry 'Lied' on Al-Qaida Presence in Syria – Putin
- Obama Will Continue to ‘Engage’ Putin on Syria
- Turkish Premier Says He Will Meet Obama, Talk Syria in Russia
- Action on Syria Would 'Balance' Situation – France
WASHINGTON, September 4 (RIA Novosti) – US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Wednesday that Russia was a supplier of chemical weapons to the Syrian military, but the Pentagon quickly backed off the claim and said Hagel was referring to conventional weapons.
Speaking in testimony before the foreign affairs committee of the US House of Representatives, Hagel said: “There’s no secret that the Assad regime has had chemical weapons, significant stockpiles of chemical weapons.”
Pressed by a representative to name the origin of those chemical weapons, Hagel added: “The Russians supply them, others are supplying them with those chemical weapons, they make some themselves.”
He did not provide further details.
Russia has long stated that it sells only conventional weapons to Syria, that these transfers are in strict compliance with international law and regulations and that they in no way modify the balance of power in the volatile region.
There was no immediate official response to Hagel’s comments from Moscow. But a Russian military expert there poured scorn on the remarks.
"The Pentagon chief's statement is a blatant lie like the notorious test tube with anthrax from the arsenal of Saddam Hussein that then-US Secretary of State Colin Powell was shaking in the Security Council," said Igor Korotchenko, a member of the public council under the Russian Defense Ministry and the chief editor of the National Defense magazine.
Korotchenko was apparently referring to an incident in 2003 when Powell demonstrated a model test tube of anthrax to show the supposed power of the Iraqi regime's biological weapons. However, a US-led survey was unable to locate WMD stockpiles in Iraq.
"The United States has powerful and effective special services, and Hagel could have turned to them to obtain comprehensive information that the Russian Federation has never supplied weapons of mass destruction to anyone, even its closest allies," Korotchenko said.
"In a response to a member of Congress, Secretary Hagel was referring to the well-known conventional arms relationship between Syria and Russia,” Little said.
Little described Syria’s chemical weapons program as “largely indigenous” but noted that Russia has provided Syria with various types of military equipment and support, “some of which can be modified or otherwise used to support the chemical weapons program.”
He did not elaborate.
Updates with Pentagon clarification.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- Mikhail1228It's not about the chemical weapons!15:44, 05/09/2013Could it be because Qatar is the largest exporter of liquid natural gas in the world and Assad won't let them build a natural gas pipeline through Syria? Of course. Qatar wants to install a puppet regime in Syria that will allow them to build a pipeline which will enable them to sell lots and lots of natural gas to Europe. If the U.S. is successful in getting rid of the Assad regime, it will be good for either the Saudis or Qatar (and possibly for both), and it will be really bad for Russia. This is a strategic geopolitical conflict about natural resources, religion and money, and it really has nothing to do with chemical weapons at all...(See Zero Hedge)
- ruypenalvaAlzheimer18:09, 05/09/2013More one case in USA state department of Alzheimer dementia.
New ties between Russia and Japan would mark not only a breakthrough in their relations but also a significant shift in Northeast Asia’s political dynamic. Both are secondary players in a region overshadowed by an increasingly assertive China, which has not hesitated to push against the boundaries of its neighbors.