- Russia, US Agree Syria Chemical Weapons Deal in Geneva
- Obama “Welcomes” US-Russian Deal on Syria
- Syria to Join Chemical Weapons Convention on October 14
- Syria Deal Leaves Many Questions Unanswered – Russian MP
- US Set to Bring Syrian Opposition to Geneva Conference – Lavrov
MOSCOW, September 15 (RIA Novosti) – The Russian-US deal on Syria, reached on Saturday, does not mean that Washington has dropped plans to impose regime change in Damascus, a senior Russian lawmaker said.
“The agreement on Syria should not create any illusions: it has hampered the US military strike but it does not mean the refusal from a “regime change” in Syria,” Alexei Pushkov, who heads the international affairs committee of the Russian parliament’s lower house, said on Twitter.
Pushkov added that the deal deprives the Syrian rebels of the opportunity to use chemical weapons for provocations. “Now it will be clear that only they could have done this,” he said.
After weeks of intense diplomacy and almost three days of talks in Geneva between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and his US counterpart John Kerry, the United States and Russia reached a landmark deal Saturday that will see all chemical weapons in war-torn Syria brought under international control and destroyed by mid-2014.
Pushkov said Saturday the deal was only “a step towards” a political solution to the conflict, and its implementation might stall if Moscow and Washington disagree on several key issues.
Washington has accused the Syrian government, which has been battling a domestic insurgency for over two years, of killing civilians outside Damascus with poison gas on August 21, and has threatened airstrikes against government targets in retaliation.
Moscow fiercely opposes military action and maintains that the attacks were carried out by Syrian rebel fighters, and Russian President Vladimir Putin called the US accusations "unimaginable nonsense."
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- bielecRegime change?19:56, 15/09/2013This can only be decided by the Syrian people in national elections. I hope Russia is not engaging in cooperation with the American bully on this.
Mr. Lavrov, just imagine that in Russia some foreign mercenaries, terrorists, and criminal useful idiots start armed rebellion, kill civilians and destroy infrastructure to destabilize the country and to provide a pretext for a "humanitarian intervention" by other countries. Do you believe that this would justify any expectation of a "regime change?" Would you step down, if, for example, Chechen fighters demanded it?
Image Galleries: Russia Celebrates Navy Day
Infographics: World War I, 1914-1918
The Brest-Litovsk peace treaty that ended Russia’s part in the war has been the subject of heated debate from the moment it was signed in March 1918. To this day, scholars offer differing interpretations of the circumstances that led to the treaty and its domestic and foreign policy importance.