- Islamic Extremism Threat to ‘Arab Spring’ Countries - Experts
- Russia Counting on UN for Post-ISAF Afghanistan Proposals
- Afghan Parliament Seeks Dialog with Opposition
- Syrian Army Opens Offensive Against Rebels - Lebanese TV
- Obama Keeps Diplomatic, Military Options Open in Syria
MOSCOW, May 23 (RIA Novosti) – Russia’s military intelligence agency, the GRU, expects the Taliban influence in Afghanistan to grow after international coalition forces are pulled out, while rising radicalism in Syria could lead to the country’s disintegration, the GRU chief said on Thursday.
Lt. Gen. Igor Sergun said the situation in Afghanistan poses a “serious challenge to international stability” and that the withdrawal of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in 2014 could also increase the threat of terrorism and religious extremism.
“A diversified terrorist network, including suicide bomber training camps has already been established in the country and the Taliban has close links with foreign terrorist structures whose militants, having gained combat experience in Afghanistan, could be sent to other hot spots across the world,” he told an international security conference in Moscow.
The situation could get even worse if those militants resume cooperation with al-Qaida and use force to establish “a global caliphate” from Morocco to Malaysia, he said.
Sergun’s Afghanistan remarks echo those of Nikolai Bordyuzha, general secretary of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), an intergovernmental military alliance headquartered in Moscow and consisting of former Soviet states, who warned last Friday that after the ISAF withdrawal from Afghanistan the situation in the part of the country near Russia’s southern borders will worsen.
A zone of instability will emerge in regions bordering Afghanistan, and the influence of extremist groups will grow, as will the penetration of Islamist fundamentalist ideas in neighboring states, Bordyuzha said.
Russia is considering deploying border guards on the Tajik-Afghan border, Moscow's envoy to Kabul, Andrei Avetisyan, told Reuters last week, adding that such a move would have to be agreed upon with Tajikistan.
Sergun also commented on the situation in war-torn Syria on Thursday, saying that radical groups will continue to impose their conditions on the way the country is run, relying solely on the use of force.
That could provoke the country’s breakup, an increasing flow of refugees to neighboring countries and further destabilization of the situation, the GRU chief said.
He also pointed to the growing number of supporters of the armed jihad from Europe within the Syrian opposition.
“After they acquire practical combat experience they can be expected to return to their countries where they will be able to apply it on the European continent,” the general said.
Last week Arab experts warned that Islamist forces coming to power in ‘Arab Spring’ countries could provoke a fresh wave of protests and lead to civil wars.
If Islamists come to power in Syria, it will divide the country, Basma Qodmani, a member of the opposition Syria National Council in 2011-12, told a meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club last Wednesday.
At the same meeting, Ahmed Ezz El-Arab, deputy head of Egypt's Wafd Party, slammed the Islamists who have taken dominant positions in that country. Muslim Brothers members who won the presidential election in Egypt “are using religion as a political tool, being patriots of their movement, not of Egypt,” he said.
“Never has there been such an incompetent government in our country’s history. They hijacked the revolution and now they want to bring in members of their movement in all positions of authority,” he said. “That will lead the country to a new revolution and a civil war.”
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
Image Galleries: Russia Celebrates Navy Day
Infographics: World War I, 1914-1918
The Brest-Litovsk peace treaty that ended Russia’s part in the war has been the subject of heated debate from the moment it was signed in March 1918. To this day, scholars offer differing interpretations of the circumstances that led to the treaty and its domestic and foreign policy importance.