MOSCOW, November 28 (RIA Novosti) – Companies controlled by the Russian Defense Ministry embezzled more than a combined 10 billion rubles ($257 million) this year, investigators said on Wednesday.
The alleged sum included 6.7 billion rubles ($215 million) suspected to have been stolen via a corruption scheme that cost Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov his job earlier this month, Investigative Committee spokesman Alexander Sorochkin said. The sum in the high-profile case was previously reported to be 3 billion rubles.
In 2011, losses from combined embezzlement at the ministry stood at 3 billion rubles, according to the Military Prosecutor General’s Office.
Investigators are planning to question Serdyukov, a longtime ally of President Vladimir Putin, over his involvement in the alleged property scam, but have not decided on the date, Sorochkin said at a news conference in Moscow.
Putin removed his Serdyukov after the corruption scandal went public earlier in November, but stressed at the time that the minister was not implicated in the case.
Two businessmen were arrested as part of the probe into the case, and a third was detained overnight, Sorochkin said on Wednesday. A close subordinate of Serdyukov’s, Yelena Vasilyeva, is currently under house arrest in Moscow.
Corruption was identified by Dmitry Medvedev as one of Russia’s greatest problems during his one-term presidency, which ended this May.
Russia shared 143rd place out of 182 nations with Nigeria in Transparency International’s 2011 global corruption index
But Medvedev admitted before standing down in favor of Vladimir Putin that his much trumpeted campaign against graft had seen “almost no” success whatsoever.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
Image Galleries: Removing Protesters’ Barricades in Kiev
Infographics: First Russian Smartphone
Some people are trying to make the reality in Russia at least a bit more humane. The amnesty should apply not only to persons involved in high-profile cases, but also to individuals who are not as well-known. It is better to set free at least some of the individuals who deserve to be released than no one at all.