MOSCOW, July 23 (RIA Novosti)
- EU Tightens Syria Sanctions As Violence Surges
- Damascus: Chemical Weapons Only for Foreign Aggression
- Arab League to Hold Emergency Ministerial Meeting on Syria
- Belgium Urges Citizens to Leave Syria
- Putin Warns Against Bypassing Security Council Syria Veto
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday articulated his plan for a peaceful settlement to the civil conflict in Syria.
“We believe that the course of action should be as follows: ending violence, conducting negotiations, searching for a solution, laying down a constitutional basis for the future society [first], and only then introducing structural changes, not vice versa. The other way around there would only be chaos,” Putin said at a meeting with Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti.
If incumbent President Bashar Assad is removed from power unconstitutionally, the civil war in the country would be “endless,” Putin added.
The Russian president said Syria’s future should be decided “not by a military victory or defeat of one of the sides, but by negotiations, on the basis of compromise and agreements reached.”
“Our stance is well known: the first thing that should be done is to ensure that… both the government and the armed opposition cease violence and engage in negotiations,” he said.
Monti said that a feasible option for Syria, in his opinion, is the “Lebanese scenario,” first applied after the 2005 assassination of a Lebanese tycoon and leading political figure Rafic Hariri.
“I mean creating a transitional government to include all parts of the Syrian society,” the Italian premier said.
The five permanent members of the UN Security Council - the U.S., Russia, China, Britain and France – agreed on June 30 in Geneva that a transitional government should be set up in Syria. The text of the document said this could include members of the government and opposition, although Russia later objected to U.S. suggestions that the deal ruled out any role for Assad.
Last week Russia withdrew its draft resolution on Syria, which backed UN Special Envoy Kofi Annan’ six-point peace plan and, together with China, vetoed a Western-backed draft over fears that it could lead to foreign military intervention in the violence-wracked Middle Eastern country.
Up to 17,000 people have been killed in clashes between Assad troops and opposition fighters since the beginning of the Syrian conflict 17 months ago, according to UN estimates based on accounts provided by Syrian activists.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- bielecA "civil conflict"?22:42, 23/07/2012I don't understand how can this be a "civil conflict". Is Russia joining the ICRC and other supporters of Western imperialism?
Isn't there enough evidence that the armed conflict in Syria is between the Syrian army and the mercenaries, terrorists, death squads, and criminals, most of whom are foreign nationals who enter Syria from Turkey, Lebanon or Jordan, who are led by a variety of Bilderberger / CFR agents living in the West, and who are supported, financed, armed, and trained by NATO countries and their regional allies? Native Syrians who join the rebels are either mislead or traitors and they will not play any major role in the outcome of this conflict.
It is absolutely clear that there is "nothing civil" in this conflict and that Syria is under attack orchestrated and led by foreign enemies. President Assad said that Syria was in a state of war.
For more information Google:
"Nothing Civil About Washington's War on Syria"
by Steve Lendman
Perhaps Russia is trying to modify the interpretation of the situation in Syria in order to support some opposition groups allied with Russia, but this is a very risky policy. NATO will keep destabilizing Syria until their goal is met. Giving NATO the "civil war" argument only brings the "humanitarian intervention" and the Libyan scenario closer.
- living069Is Mr. Putin the only sane leader?07:18, 24/07/2012How can another country dictate who will lead the country, Syrian president welcomed all those that wanted to run in the near future presidential elections, yet they don't want to, democracy is about letting the people of the country decide who they want, not about others telling the people who should be in whether they like it or not. It seems america and Russia are trading places with democracy and communism.