The idea of the blacklist originated last year from Russia’s League of Internet Security© RIA Novosti. Vitali Ankov
MOSCOW, July 6 (RIA Novosti)
- Russia to Create Internet Blacklist
- Putin Ponders Corruption, Internet Democracy in New Article
- Number of Internet Users Worldwide Tops 2 billion
- Russian internet watchdog proposes bills to fight child porn, online extremism
The lower house of the Russian parliament, the State Duma, will hold on Friday initial hearings on a bill proposing a unified digital blacklist of all websites containing pornography, drug ads and promoting suicide or extremist ideas.
The controversial bill, supported by all four party factions in the State Duma, has been widely criticized by civil rights activists and internet providers as an attempt to introduce censorship of the Russian segment of the internet (RuNet).
The idea of the blacklist originated last year from Russia’s League of Internet Security after the internet watchdog said it had broken up an international ring of 130 alleged pedophiles circulating material via the internet.
According to the draft document, submitted to the State Duma on June 7, the unified roster of banned websites will be run by a federal agency to be appointed by the government.
The agency will have the right to add items to the blacklist, as will the courts, which already have the authority to ban extremist and other types of content that violates Russian legislation.
The supporters of the blacklist believe it would curb the spread of on-line pornography and propaganda of extremism.
However, the opponents of the idea insist that the current version of the bill cannot be an effective tool for rooting out the illegal content and stopping its spread on the internet as it will not prevent “dirty” users from migrating to other domains and IP-addresses.
Russia’s presidential Human Rights Council (HRC) blasted the draft legislation on Thursday saying the proposed measures would only put an additional financial burden on internet providers and “negatively affect RuNet’s speed, stability and security.”
The council proposed to withdraw the bill and put it out for public discussion with participation of experts on the issue.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- jgBad idea12:51, 06/07/2012"Protecting the children" and "fighting terrorism" are the typical reasons given for introducing censorship but blocking websites is unlikely to have any significant impact on either paedophiles or terrorists. They will probably use technical means (proxies, VPNs, etc.) to circumvent any website ban and much of their communication may not use websites at all. History shows that censorship is inevitably used for political ends, so political and human rights groups, trying to expose corruption and other crimes by public officials will likely be those most affected by such a ban.
If the authorities want to do something about websites promoting illegal activities, it would be more effective to arrest and prosecute those running the websites within Russian jurisdiction. The same can be said of other countries who are also contemplating similar blacklists.