- Russia Says UN Syria Sanctions Possible Only in Event of Noncompliance
- Russian Lawmakers Planning Visit to Syria
- Putin Addresses Risks of Terrorism Spilling Over From Syria
- Lavrov, Kerry Hold Phone Conversation on Syria
- US ‘Blackmails’ Russia over Syria Resolution – Lavrov
- Russia Welcomes Plans by UN Inspectors to Return to Syria – Lavrov
- Russia ‘In Theory’ Ready to Change Stance on Syria – Kremlin
- US Prepared to Strike Syria if UN Deal Falls Short – Official
WASHINGTON, September 25 (RIA Novosti) – A United Nations Security Council resolution on eliminating Syria’s chemical weapons will refer to – but not automatically trigger – military action to enforce Syria’s compliance with a US-Russian deal to destroy its arsenal, The Associated Press (AP) cited a Russian diplomat as saying Wednesday.
Washington has pushed for a resolution based on Chapter 7 of the UN Charter, which allows for military action to promote peace, though Russian officials have repeatedly called this unacceptable.
But Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov said the text of the resolution would include a reference to Chapter 7, though noncompliance by Syria would not automatically trigger the use of force, The Associated Press (AP) reported.
An agreement on the text of the resolution is likely in the next two days, the AP cited Gatilov as saying.
His comments emerged almost simultaneously with conflicting reports from diplomats Wednesday about the state of the negotiations over the Security Council resolution.
Reuters cited two Western diplomats as saying that the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council had agreed on the core of a resolution.
The agreement came after the foreign ministers from the United States, Russia, France, China and Britain met Wednesday with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Reuters cited the diplomats as saying on condition of anonymity.
But the spokesman for Russia’s UN delegation told Reuters that this is “wishful thinking” by the Western diplomats.
“It is not the reality,” the news agency cited the spokesman as saying. “The work on the draft resolution is still going on.”
The draft resolution could be presented to the full 15-nation Security Council “soon,” Reuters cited the two Western diplomats as saying, adding that the five permanent members – who each hold veto power – would meet Friday for talks on possible peace negotiations in Geneva between the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad and rebel forces seeking to topple him.
Britain’s ambassador to the UN, Mark Lyall Grant, told the AP that he expects remaining differences over the text of the resolution to be resolved “in the next few days.”
The administration of US President Barack Obama has accused Assad’s government of responsibility for an Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack outside Damascus that Washington claims left more than 1,400 dead.
Russian officials, including President Vladimir Putin, have repeatedly suggested in recent weeks that they have evidence showing the attack was likely carried out by Syrian rebels seeking to frame Assad in order to secure outside military intervention against government forces.
After weeks of intense diplomacy and an almost three-day-long marathon of talks in Geneva between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and US Secretary of State John Kerry, Moscow and Washington reached a breakthrough agreement earlier this month to place Syria’s chemical weapons under international control for eventual destruction.
The Obama administration has insisted that a Security Council resolution must include the option of military action against Syria should Assad’s government fail to abide by the deal. It has also said it reserves the right to conduct military strikes against Syria independent of the UN.
A US official told Reuters that negotiations were continuing. “We’re making progress but we’re not done yet,” Reuters cited the official as saying.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- rochefortfrancois(no title)02:32, 26/09/2013As long as there will be something to gain, NATO will pursue the same path. If Russia does not understand this this very soon, it will loose everything. NATO must be stoped. Their allies needs to get attacked as well. Defensive military strategy never wins as the attacker gets no dammage and is free to invest in further military actions.
- zapeepachemo weapon in syria is not the west issue20:07, 26/09/2013chemo weapon in Syria is not the issue for Nato or the US, Never been never was,It became an issue after saudis and french intel helped those primitive mercenaries how to use this and it work as convenient excuse . THe plan is to fragment and weaken syria in any means available implanted extremists in syria to keep the chaos going. Who benefit form this Israel and most of the reactionaries from monarchies and the Nato countries that getting the business of oil.
Image Galleries: Removing Protesters’ Barricades in Kiev
Infographics: First Russian Smartphone
Edward Snowden is not an isolated case but part of an independent community which is increasingly resolute in asserting itself and rejecting “raison d’Etat” and behind-the-scenes manipulation. The direct results of Snowden’s disclosures are most clearly evident in the context of Russian-American relations. The Snowden case has humiliated Europe, which Putin took the opportunity to remind them of.