Topic: Protests in Syria
A UN expert, wearing a gas mask, holds a plastic bag containing samples from one of the sites of an alleged chemical attack, Damascus, August 29, 2013© REUTERS/ Mohamed Abdullah
- Russian Chemicals Arms Supplies to Syria ‘Hogwash’ – Kremlin
- Why Are Chemical Weapons the ‘Red Line’ for Intervention in Syria?
- UN to Speed Up Analysis of Syria Chemical Weapons Data
- Syrian President Assad Dismisses Claims of Chemical Weapons Use
BERLIN, September 8 (RIA Novosti) – German intelligence sources suggest that last month's alleged chemical weapons attack in Damascus was not ordered by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, Bild am Sonntag has reported.
Forces loyal to President Assad had been asking him for four months to use chemical weapons against the rebels, but they still received no approval from the Syrian leader. Therefore, the August 21 attack “might not have been sanctioned by Assad,” the report said.
The newspaper also said citing German intelligence that President Assad is likely to remain in power for a long time, even if the United States conducts military strikes on Syria.
US President Barack Obama recently asked the US Congress to support a limited military intervention in Syria because of the regime’s alleged use of chemical weapons, which the US claims killed over a thousand civilians in one attack on August 21.
The unrest in Syria began in March 2011 and later escalated into a civil war. More than 100,000 people have been killed in the conflict so far, according to UN estimates.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
If attempts to drag Russia into a direct military conflict in Ukraine are successful, it would be a catastrophe for Russia comparable to the 1979-1989 Afghan war. There is no direct evidence that the US is trying to bring about a second Afghan war, but indirect evidence abounds.