MOSCOW, June 28 (RIA Novosti)
A ready flow of weapons from China, Sudan and Ukraine has fueled violence by both the South Sudanese Armed Forces and armed opposition groups in South Sudan's Unity State in 2010 and 2011, Amnesty International said on Thursday.
The human rights watchdog has documented serious human rights violations, committed by all sides using an array of weapons including Ukrainian-supplied T-72M1 main battle tanks (MBTs), Chinese-made rifles and anti-vehicle mines, and Sudanese-made mortar shells.
“The clandestine delivery of [T-72] main battle tanks from Ukraine to South Sudan in 2009, involved transfers via Kenya and Uganda,” Amnesty International said in a new report published just days ahead of a crucial UN meeting on an Arms Trade Treaty.
“Scores of people have been killed or injured, had their homes destroyed, or have been forced to flee due to indiscriminate attacks on civilian areas by the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) and the South Sudan Liberation Army (SSLA)” the report said.
Amnesty International has called for a strong and robust treaty with rules to end irresponsible arms transfers to those likely to use them for serious violations of human rights and war crimes.
"Governments must immediately stop supplying South Sudan with conventional arms which have been used to commit violations of international humanitarian and human rights law until adequate systems of training and accountability are in place," said Erwin van der Borght, Amnesty International's Africa Director.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- lmDouble standards..18:47, 28/06/2012Did the same human rights people said the same of the countries that is supplying the rebels no they did not and if they did it was a muted one? I want these human rights people who seem to be aiding and abetting wars thru their often bias reports, to come out and say the same for other countries that are arming the rebels in Syria.
News that Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin would resign in order to run for the mayoral election in September came as quite a shock. Sobyanin’s political potential is fairly dubious, not to mention his approval ratings. He has not finished many of the projects he initiated and the electoral effect from these projects is expected to come a bit later than September 2013. Sobyanin’s opponents were not entirely unprepared for this blitzkrieg.