Topic: Protests in Syria
Russia and Syria have signed a $550-million contract on the delivery of 36 Yakovlev Yak-130 Mitten combat trainer© RIA Novosti. Anton Denisov
MOSCOW, January 23 (RIA Novosti)
- U.S. Seeks Russia’s Explanation on Syria-Bound Weapons Ship
- Russia pitches 3rd Resolution Draft on Syria
- Russian weapons ship arrives in Syria - paper
- Top UN official says 400 people killed in Syria in two weeks
Russia and Syria have signed a $550-million contract on the delivery of 36 Yakovlev Yak-130 Mitten combat trainer, the Kommersant daily quoted on Monday a source close to Russia’s state arms exporter Rosoboronexport as saying.
Under the deal struck in late December, the jets are to be supplied to Syria once Damascus makes a prepayment, the source said.
A source in the aircraft production industry told the newspaper the aircraft construction company Irkut is able to produce the jets for Syria in a relatively short time.
Contacted by RIA Novosti, both Rosoboronexport and Irkut declined to comment.
Analysts say the contract is “risky” given the worsening satiation in Syria and the growing international pressure on President Bashar al-Assad over his crackdown on protesters.
Ruslan Pukhov, who heads the Moscow-based Center for Analysis of Stategies and Technologies, said the contract was “certainly a big success of Russia’s leaders and arms traders.” But it’s clear, he said, that “the international community, led by the United States, has made a decision to crush Bashar al-Assad’s regime, and this may lead to the contract being disrupted and Russia suffering image and financial losses.”
The contract was apparently signed when the situation in Syria was “not as dramatic as it is now,” Pukhov said, adding that getting the Russian jets has likely lost its relevance for Damascus.
“The Yak-130 plane is superfluous for attacking insurgents – these goals can be served by cheaper planes,” the analyst said. At the same time, he said, the jet cannot endure air battles with Israeli, Turkish, or Western coalition’s aircraft, should a military conflict erupt in Syria.
Russia has opposed international sanctions, including an arms embargo, against Syria, where the death toll from clashes between protesters and government troops has reached 5,400, according to the United Nations.
Earlier this month, the United States expressed concerns over weapons deliveries to Damascus following media reports about a Russian ship loaded with arms docking in the Syrian port of Tartus.
Without explicitly confirming the report of the arms shipment, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said last week Russia was not going to justify its actions before the West because it was not violating “any international agreements or any [UN] Security Council resolutions.”
“We are only trading items with Syria that are not banned by international law,” he said.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- antfreRussia sells.....15:51, 23/01/2012Why is it that Russia, either under Communism or any other form of government, always side with the tirannies?
- flyingkiwiYak 130 to Syria08:32, 24/01/2012I do think this is wrong selling jets to Syria I guess this deal will not happen as I am sure Syria will be broke very soon
- ArmenianWhat Russia sells is only Russia's business...08:32, 25/01/2012Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Columbia and Egypt are tyrannies armed with the latest in US weaponry.
Western forces enjoy fighting handicapped opponents. That is what they are worried about Russia not complying with an arms sanction against Iran and Syria.
No one has any business telling Moscow who it call or cannot sell weapons to...
- flyingkiwiThe UN seems to think its wrong09:43, 25/01/2012The UN has the right to tell Moscow who to sell weapons to but Moscow is just trying to make a quick buck of course Russia doesn't have many friends anymore since the Warsaw pact ended so of course needs to keep countries like Syria on its side
We have witnessed the total defeat of western Ukraine, Western nationalists and the West in general, which made the unfortunate decision to support the anti-government activity. They failed to realize that the collapse of Yanukovych means the collapse of Ukrainian unity. They set fire to their own home and planted a time bomb under Ukraine’s territorial integrity.