"The IAEA has no questions left about Iran's nuclear program. Iran has responded to all questions and the agency has issued its final report on the case," Elham said.
In a statement accompanying a new report on Iran's nuclear activities, Mohamed ElBaradei, director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said on Friday that good progress had been made in the past four months in clarifying the outstanding issues.
However, ElBaradei urged Tehran to implement "as actively as possible, as fast as possible" the IAEA's Additional Protocol, which allows snap inspections of Iranian nuclear facilities.
The Iranian government spokesman told the press that with the IAEA report available Tehran could see no reasons for discussing and adopting a new resolution against the Islamic Republic.
Elham also said that his country would continue its cooperation with the IAEA in keeping with Non-Proliferation Treaty regulations, noting that Iran's decisions were based on its national interests and freedom of action.
Iranian chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili hailed the IAEA report as yet another proof that Iran's nuclear research was peaceful.
"This report showed that our activities are peaceful," Jalili told a news conference in Tehran shortly after the IAEA report was released in Vienna.
The five permanent UN Security Council members and Germany agreed at talks in Berlin on January 22 on a draft for a third round of sanctions against Iran calling for travel bans, asset freezes and vigilance on all banks in the Islamic Republic.
The new draft resolution was officially introduced by France and Britain in the UN Security Council on Thursday, and council members are expected to vote on the resolution at some point next week.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
Image Galleries: Removing Protesters’ Barricades in Kiev
Infographics: First Russian Smartphone
Some people are trying to make the reality in Russia at least a bit more humane. The amnesty should apply not only to persons involved in high-profile cases, but also to individuals who are not as well-known. It is better to set free at least some of the individuals who deserve to be released than no one at all.