MOSCOW, June 19 (RIA Novosti)
- U.S. Worried about Opposition Searches, Rally Law in Russia
- Kremlin Rights Experts Lambast Rally Law
- Russian Rally Law Pushes Protesters Abroad
- Protest Law Brings Discussion Back to Duma
Want to buy a loaf of bread in the company of your friends? In Russia, that may well turn out to be illegal, following a decision by authorities in the central Nizhny Novgorod city to ban just such an enterprise.
"The March for the Loaf" - the smartest challenge yet to a new controversial law that sharply increases fines for breaking laws governing protests - "did not meet" statute specifications, the city government said.
But Andrei Rudoy, an activist of the opposition Left Front movement who applied for official permission to hold the rally, was undeterred by the rebuff, writing on his LiveJournal blog on Monday that some 15 more requests had already been filed, including one for waiting for the bus.
"Frankly, I'm becoming more and more convinced that this [government] system is in its essence inadequate," Rudoy wrote, calling on activists in other parts of Russia to join in on his tactic. "Let's play along with the lunatics behind the Kremlin walls some more."
The law, signed by President Vladimir Putin ahead of a massive June 12 Moscow demonstration against his rule, raises the maximum fines for protest-related offences from the current 5,000 rubles ($154) to 300,000 ($9,200) for participants and 600,000 rubles ($18,400) for officials.
The vastly increased fines were proposed by deputies from the ruling United Russia party in the wake of clashes between police and demonstrators at a downtown Moscow rally on the eve of Putin's May 7 inauguration for a third term in the Kremlin.
The Nizhny Novgorod admninistration could not be reached for comment.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
Image Galleries: Removing Protesters’ Barricades in Kiev
Infographics: First Russian Smartphone
Some people are trying to make the reality in Russia at least a bit more humane. The amnesty should apply not only to persons involved in high-profile cases, but also to individuals who are not as well-known. It is better to set free at least some of the individuals who deserve to be released than no one at all.