- South Moscow officials' Skype addresses to be made public
- Russia will not ban Skype, gmail, hotmail despite FSB concerns
- Internet providers should be punished for piracy - Russian deputy PM
- Russia supports non-restriction of Internet - Medvedev
- Russian president supports national search engine on Internet
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has played down the prospect of China-style Internet censorship in Russia, just two weeks after the FSB, the country's domestic security service demanded access to net communication services like Gmail and Skype.
The FSB's proposal caused alarm among Russia's estimated 60 million Internet users, who said it was disturbingly reminiscent of the recent repressive past.
The FSB claimed the "uncontrolled use of these services could lead to a large-scale threat to Russian security."
"The Internet is a tool for solving social and administrative problems; it is an opportunity to communicate, to express yourself, it is a tool for improving your living standards," Putin said in a Q&A session after what could be his final address to parliament as premier on Wednesday.
"The main resources are situated oversees, and this has been a source for concern for the special services," he went on. "But I personally think that it is not possible to restrict anything."
The FSB's proposal came just days before a massive cyber attack on prominent blogging site LiveJournal, used as an outlet by Russia's opposition and civil movements. President Dmitry Medvedev, whose blog was affected by the attack, demanded that those responsible were tracked down.
Runet, a moniker for Russia's Internet sector, has been largely free of government controls compared with traditional media.
MOSCOW, April 20 (RIA Novosti)
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
If attempts to drag Russia into a direct military conflict in Ukraine are successful, it would be a catastrophe for Russia comparable to the 1979-1989 Afghan war. There is no direct evidence that the US is trying to bring about a second Afghan war, but indirect evidence abounds.