1/11/2014 9:03
RIA Novosti


Russian Parliament Approves Military Action in Ukraine

Topic: Turbulence in Ukraine

1 / 2
Russia's Federation Council (archive)Pro-Russian protests in Crimea
22:04 01/03/2014
Originally posted at 19:30. Updated.
Tags: Russian Federation Council, Barack Obama, Vladimir Putin, Crimea, Russia, Moscow

MOSCOW, March 1 (RIA Novosti) – Russia’s upper house of parliament unanimously approved a request from President Vladimir Putin on Saturday to deploy military forces in Ukraine in a move that could escalate a confrontation in the Crimean peninsula.

Putin issued his request in response to what he said was a threat to the lives of Russian citizens and military forces located in naval bases in Ukraine’s southern peninsula of Crimea.

All 90 Senators present in the 116-member Federation Council voted in support of armed action.

Ukraine’s interim President Oleksandr Turchynov told US Secretary of State John Kerry that he considered Russia’s conduct a “direction act of aggression against the sovereignty of Ukraine.”

Turchynov said he expected assistance from Ukraine’s strategic partners in resolving the standoff. EU foreign ministers are due to meet Monday to discuss the fast-developing situation.

The move by the Federation Council comes amid reports of large Russian troop movements in Crimea and a week after opposition parties swept to power in Kiev when ousted President Viktor Yanukovych suddenly fled the city.

Russian troops will remain deployed until the “political-social situation in the country is normalized,” the Kremlin said in a statement requesting the intervention.

The exact size of any planned deployment is not yet known, but Federation Council Senator Viktor Ozerov said after Saturday’s vote that the decision on how many troops could be involved would be taken by Putin.

Federation Council Senators lined up during an extraordinary session to express their support for armed intervention.

Much of the focus of debates in the upper house was on the seizure of power by opposition groups last week, which marked the culmination of three months of anti-government protests ignited by Yanukovych’s decision to back away from a planned deal to enhance economic and political ties with the EU.

Lawmakers accused the United States and European countries of open support for violent protesters in Ukraine.

Deputy Speaker Yury Vorobyov said protesters in Kiev were trained in Poland and Latvia with US money and that if Russia did not intervene militarily it would be tragedy for the Ukrainian people.

Russia’s Federal Migration Service said it has noted a sharp spike in applications from Ukrainian citizens seeking refuge.

The head of the migration service’s citizenship department, Valentina Kazakova, said 143,000 people had applied for asylum in the last two weeks of February alone.

“People are afraid for the fate of those close to them and are asking not just for protection, but also to help them receive fast-tracked Russian citizenship,” Kazakova said. “A large number of applications are from members of Ukrainian law enforcement bodies and government officials fearing reprisals from radically disposed groups.”

The vote follows a wave of pro-Russian protests in southern and eastern Ukraine, as well as calls from the newly elected prime minister of Crimea for Putin to intervene.

Russian officials have claimed that an armed group was dispatched to Crimea’s administrative center, Simferopol, from Kiev to storm the headquarters of the local Interior Ministry.

"During the attempted capture of the Interior Ministry building in Crimea there were injuries, there are victims. There is intimidation and threats, people are in this situation naturally gravely concerned for their life, for their own safety and that of their families,” said Federation Council Speaker Valentina Matviyenko. “This forced the government of Crimea to turn to Russia for assistance."

Ukraine’s UNIAN news agency cited police in Crimea, however, as denying any attempt to seize the Interior Ministry building had taken place.

Beyond serving as the strategic location of Moscow’s Black Sea Fleet, Crimea is home to a large ethnic Russian community, which has reacted with alarm to what it sees as the aggressively nationalistic government that has taken hold since last month’s overthrow of President Yanukovych.

Crimea’s ties with Russia go back a long way.

Until Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev in 1954 transferred the territory to what was then the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Crimea was officially a part of Russia.

Further complicating matters, around one-tenth of the peninsula’s population is comprised of traditionally Muslim ethnic Tatars, who have made a public show of coming out in support of the interim government.

The ratcheting up of Russian rhetoric over Ukraine and widespread reports of the presence of Russian troops already maneuvering on Ukrainian soil has provoked outrage in Kiev and condemnation from world leaders.

US President Barack Obama said Friday that he was deeply concerned about Russian troop movements, and warned that violations of Ukraine’s sovereignty would be deeply destabilizing.

British Foreign Minister William Hague announced after the Federation Council vote that the Russian ambassador in London had been summoned for consultations.

"We oppose [the] decision to deploy Russian troops on Ukrainian soil against wishes of [Ukraine's government] and condemn any act of aggression," Hague wrote on his Twitter account.

Hague is due to travel to Ukraine on Sunday for talks with officials in Kiev.

The interim Ukrainian government has said Russia is trying to provoke conflict, and have called on the Kremlin to withdraw all soldiers back to Russian naval bases on the Black Sea coast.

Vladimir Klitschko, a former boxing champion who was a prominent leader in the protest movement, called on interim President Oleksandr Turchynov to demand that the UN Security Council immediately convene an extraordinary session.

He also called on parliament to declare full mobilization over what he described as “aggression against Ukraine.”

Steven Pifer, a veteran diplomat who served as US Ambassador to Ukraine in the 1990s, wrote on Twitter that Moscow’s declared intent to launch military action was in violation of a treaty signed by Russia, the United States, Britain and Ukraine in 1994.

“As one who helped [negotiate the] 1994 memorandum, [there is] no doubt in my mind that Russia is violating its commitments,” Pifer wrote.

US Senator John McCain, who addressed hundreds of thousands of protesters in Kiev last year, tweeted Saturday that the Russian parliament's decision was "straight out of [the] Soviet playbook."

The threat of military intervention has been only one strand in a campaign of pressure by Moscow against an incoming Ukrainian government that the Kremlin has refused adamantly to acknowledge.

On Saturday, state energy giant Gazprom indicated it was likely discontinue discounts on gas exports to Ukraine, a development that would spell disaster for Kiev’s cash-starved coffers.

Updates with details, quotes, reactions. Recasts lede.

  • Add to blog
  • Send to friend
  • Share

Add to blog

You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.

Publication code:


RIA NovostiRussia's Federation Council (archive)Russian Parliament Approves Military Action in Ukraine

22:04 01/03/2014 Russia’s upper house of parliament unanimously approved a request from President Vladimir Putin on Saturday to deploy military forces in Ukraine in a move that could escalate a confrontation in the Crimean peninsula.>>

Send by e-mail

All fields are required!

Leave a comment
  • R.Deus-von HomeyerRE:EMOTIONS
    20:09, 01/03/2014
    Typicaly Russians! I read at the moment" Chaika" by Anton Chehov.

    The Russians allow to be lead by their emotions.

    Finally Russia enjoyssuch a gooooooooooood reputationin the world!

    Yes,I understand,YOU,Russians want to have Krim again and are up-set,that STALIN make it a present to UKRAINA! But do you want to have it for ever or just stay there some months and leave,because the UN certainly willmake you to leave.

    Krimwas given by YOU to Ukraina...sorry...presents are presents...you can not ask to be returned.

    If you want KRIM for good,you should find OTHER methods.
    • Wolfgang9Maybe,
      20:09, 02/03/2014
      you should just learn some history and some better English! Stalin did not make the Crimea part of the Ukraine! It was N. S. Chruschtschow at a time when this was basically meaningless.
      And I don't think there was any legal base for that since at that time that had no consequences. Historically the Crimea belongs to Russia since Catherine the Great! And one more thing: As I understand, the people who live in Eastern Ukraine will vote and that outcome is enough that Russia will have legal base to save their people!

      Naturally, as a German you would probably not think too much of the people's will since they are screwed here in Germany for more than 20 years!!

      I'm not sure how old you are, but I think after reading your posts you are not even an adult!
    • bielecA few replies
      20:51, 01/03/2014
      To Klitchko: - Brother, your brain is too small and too shaken to understand politics. Russia and China have veto powers at the UN Security Council.

      To Pifer: Your call on Russia to respect memorandums and other legalities sounds ridiculous coming from a country that regularly violates international law, supports terrorists, Neo-Nazis, and criminals, or uses military invasions in order to overthrow legitimate, democratically elected governments in sovereign countries. You must think that people are stupid and this insults us all.

      To McCain: Maybe it is not from Soviet playbook. Maybe it is just copying what America did in Panama, in Malvines, in Yugoslavia, in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Libya, in Syria, and yes, in Ukraine. The only difference is that in each of these cases America acted on lies.
    • rochefortfrancois(no title)
      02:09, 02/03/2014
      At last! Let hope Putin lives forever!
    • rationalamericanDouble Standards
      04:02, 02/03/2014
      And this is different from Syria how?

      What makes this comparatively less violent revolution so much more urgent than the FULL BLOWN CIVIL WAR happening in Syria, that has had so many massacres I have in all actuality lost count.

      Many of you Russian nationalists that populate this site and fill the comments section with your bile and violent bias, love to accuse the US (and West in general) of warmongering and illegal invasions. But when Mr. Putin does the EXACT SAME THING, you all start throwing rose petals and calling his name in praise. I swear he could piss on you all and call it rain, and you would all make excuses for him or say he was doing the right thing. Unbelievable.

      Well that isn't the case here in the non-magical land we call reality. The shoe is on the other damn foot today and Russia is going to invade a sovereign nation on one of the most bullshit excuses I've ever heard. You lot love telling the US to stay out of other countries' business, Putin in particular spoke much of respecting the rights of other Nations(the hypocrite). Two of the most common sentences I've heard are.
      [US] stay out of [Libya]
      [US] stay out of [Syria]
      I cannot recall how many times I've seen those sentences recited time and time again with some minor variation like [America], [The West] or [Obama]. Well today I say...
      [Russia] stay out of [Ukraine]

      As for The Crimea, mrgenie has stated in another article, the Crimea has exchanged hands so many times, the "ownership" of the region has become completely muddled. So why don't we let the people living there decide their own fate in a fair and legal vote. They are an autonomous Republic, let them express their autonomy for themselves.
    • R.Deus-von HomeyerRE:TO BE OR NOT TO BE...that is the question?
      20:04, 03/03/2014
      WHY having JUST a piece of cake(KRUIM),if you could have the WHOLE cake(UKRAINA).

      As a BULGARIAN(there is NO one drop German blood in my body...I was thought as a young girl in BULGARIA to LOVE the Russians,because they liberated Bulgaria from Turkish rule.

      Some people on this portal(WOLFGANG) think,that I am GERMAN just because my family name sounds German. I got this name from my ex-husband.

      So...may be my English is not good,but I read "Tri sestrui" by Chehov in ORIGINAL Russian language.

    © 2014  RIA Novosti
    Some material may be inappropriate for those under 18