Topic: Punk Group Pussy Riot Case
Updated at 16:50
- Pussy Riot Member Punished for Oversleeping
- Pussy Riot Documentary Wins Sundance Film Festival Award
- Court Dismisses Pussy Riot Member’s Deferral Plea
- Pussy Riot Member Turns to European Human Rights Court
MOSCOW, February 1 (RIA Novosti) – A jailed member of the female punk band Pussy Riot, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, has been sent to hospital for a medical examination, the Russian prison service said on Friday.
"Tolokonnikova was sent to a hospital at her own and her lawyer’s request,” a Federal Prison Service spokesperson told RIA Novosti, confirming media reports stating she was in hospital. The service did not elaborate, citing patient confidentiality.
Yekaterina Samutsevich, another Pussy Riot member, told Dozhd television that Tolokonnikova has been suffering from headaches. Samutsevich said her friend’s health problems started before she was convicted in August and could be a symptom of a serious illness.
“Back in spring 2012 Nadezhda was repeatedly complaining of headaches when she was in pre-trial detention,” Tolokonnikova's lawyer Irina Khrunova, said in written comments sent to RAPSI news agency on Friday. “In prison conditions, the pain has got worse,” she said.
Earlier medical tests on Tolokonnikova could not reveal the cause of her health problems and she is in need of a proper diagnosis, Khrunova added.
Tolokonnikova, 23, and another band member Maria Alyokhina, 24, are serving two-year terms for "hooliganism motivated by religious hatred" for performing an anti-Kremlin “punk prayer” at Moscow's Christ the Savior Cathedral last February.
Samutsevich was given a suspended sentence.
Earlier version of the story was updated with lawyer's comment.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
Image Galleries: Removing Protesters’ Barricades in Kiev
Infographics: First Russian Smartphone
Some people are trying to make the reality in Russia at least a bit more humane. The amnesty should apply not only to persons involved in high-profile cases, but also to individuals who are not as well-known. It is better to set free at least some of the individuals who deserve to be released than no one at all.