Topic: US Adoption Ban
- US Senate Appeals to Russia to Reconsider Adoption Law
- Adoption Ban Law Comes Into Force In Russia
- Due West: Divide and Fall – Unintended Results of Russia’s Adoption Ban
- Russian Deputy Proposes Amendment To Adoption Ban Law
- Adoption Ban Denies Disabled Kids a New Start: US Families
KIEV, January 4 (RIA Novosti) – Ukraine’s President Viktor Yanukovych has waded into the heated debate on international adoption that followed the US Magnitsky Act and Russia's response, stressing that the issue of adoption must not be politicized.
“My main principle is that the interests of the child should be paramount in all issues that concern them. I think it is wrong for the issue of adoption to be focused on to political ends,” Yanukovych said in an interview with a Ukrainian newspaper on Friday.
The debate over the issue continues, following the US introduction of the Magnitsky Act and Russia’s response – which includes a ban on the adoption of Russian children by US citizens.
In his interview with Ukraine's Komsomolskaya Pravda, the president was adamant that adoption-related issues should be handled professionally. He also made the point that the need for international adoption would vanish if homes for abandoned children could be found domestically.
“In recent years the state’s priority regarding adoption has fundamentally changed. Our day-to-day task, which we are seeing bear fruit, is for each child who has lost their parents to find a home within Ukraine,” he said.
Yanukovych noted that, this year, Ukrainians adopted nearly three times more children than foreigners, and added that Ukrainian law places a restriction on the adoption of healthy children under five by foreigners.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
Image Galleries: Yury Gagarin: Life of the First Man in Space in Pictures
Infographics: Sledge Hockey
The unconstitutional takeover in Ukraine was the toughest, consistent and so far most effective Western counterattack launched amid the ongoing struggle for a fairer world order. Only the naïve believe that the United States and Europe will willingly share their right to rule the world, though their belief is worthy of respect.