The report among other issues condemns the United States for its failure to close the Guantanamo detention facility© RIA Novosti. Denis Voroshilov
WASHINGTON, October 22 (By Carl Schreck for RIA Novosti)
The United States on Monday shrugged off scathing Russian criticism of its human rights record, with Washington offering no official reaction to the report from Russia’s Foreign Ministry and experts saying it was unlikely to get much notice here.
The US State Department did not respond Monday to several requests for comment on the report, which accuses the United States of a range of alleged rights abuses and “double standards” when assessing the rights records of other countries.
The report, presented in the Russian State Duma on Monday, echoes many of the criticisms of the United States voiced by international rights organizations such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International—organizations that regularly criticize Russia as well.
It takes the United States to task for its record on capital punishment, secret CIA detention facilities abroad, extrajudicial killings of suspected terrorists, and government surveillance of foreigners’ and Americans’ electronic communications.
The report also condemns the United States for its failure to close the Guantanamo detention facility, for the size of the country’s prison population, which totals 2.2 million, for alleged police brutality, abuse of immigrant workers, and for faults in its electoral system.
But Steven Pifer, a former senior State Department official and White House adviser on the former Soviet Union, said the report is unlikely to earn much attention in Washington.
“Most American officials concede that there are problems here,” Pifer said. “But the idea that the problems here on democracy, for example, equate with the problems that you see in Russia over the last 10 years, I don’t think people are going to take that as a serious suggestion.”
The criticisms in the report are similar to those issued last year in a Russian government report on the state of human rights abroad. That report also singled out the United States for numerous alleged rights violations and was widely seen as Russia’s response to US State Department’s annual report on international human rights, in which Russia is routinely censured.
Last December, a State Department spokesman said in response to the first Russian government human rights report that the United States is “an open book” in terms of its rights record.
“We certainly don’t regard it as interference in our internal affairs when foreign governments, individuals or organizations comment on or criticize U.S. human rights practices,” the spokesman, Scott Toner, told reporters at the time.
Moscow has regularly accused Washington of double standards on rights issues going back to the Soviet era, Pifer noted.
“The Russian government, like the Soviet government, never liked it when the United States commented on democracy or human rights in Russia, and this is just kind of a tit-for-tat report,” said Pifer, who served as US ambassador to Ukraine from 1998 to 2000.
Pifer said it is unlikely anyone in Russia’s political elite believes the report will influence US policy with regard to human rights.
It’s more likely, he suggested, that Russian officials will use it later on to fend off outside criticism of Moscow’s own rights record.
“I don’t think it’s going to get a lot of attention here,” Pifer said.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- Panthera Pardusthe great difference about torture in US is that..13:06, 23/10/2012also imprisonment without access to lawyers, actually one can just be a desaparecido, not only if you are foreign but also if you are an American citizen – all under the supervision of Obama, the first black Emperor, also Nobel Price for Peace and with weekly meeting to decide assassination by drones. The only positive effect of all this was to show that the Nobel Price for Peace is a joke assigned by Norwegian clowns, Norway also is home of Fogh Rasmussen, another notable war criminal who unfortunately cannot be transferred (or better “extraordinary rendition”) for torture in any secret jail
what did Pifer said.. "US is an open book" right, an open book but without pages ROTFL !
The solution to the Ukrainian problem will directly depend on how the military operations unfold in Donbass. If the militia fighters take over the strategic initiative, win back Donbass and extend the war to the Zaporozhye and the Kharkov regions, then Kiev will be more amenable to a compromise