MOSCOW, October 2 (Alexey Eremenko, RIA Novosti)
- WWF Names Key to Better Ecology in Russia
- Russia, France plan joint holiday resorts in turbulent North Caucasus
- Russia's ecology activists concerned over new Khimki Forest clearing
- Russia needs 10 yrs of sustainable development - Putin
The once war-torn republic of Chechnya is among Russia’s prospective economic powerhouses if its environmental potential is factored in, according to a study of Russian regions released on Tuesday.
The North Caucasus region only lost to the Siberian republic of Altai in the first Economic-Environmental Index of Russian Regions, prepared jointly by RIA Novosti and World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and presented in Moscow.
The top 10 regions mostly comprised remote national republics with undeveloped economies, while the bottom 10 was dominated by oil-producing regions which are literally pumping their future away, the study’s authors said.
“If you’re eating away your natural capital, it’s not sustainable development,” said Sergei Bobylyov, an expert on environmental management with the Moscow State University and the study’s co-author.
The study evaluates the 83 regions based on adjusted net saving, a World Bank-penned alternative to GDP that takes into account depletion of natural resources, pollution damages and investment in human capital when calculating a country’s or region’s wealth.
In addition to Altai and Chechnya, the leaders on eco-friendly economic development included the far eastern Jewish autonomous region, the republics of Tuva in Siberia, Ingushetia, Adygea and Kabardino-Balkaria in the North Caucasus, the republic of Kalmykia on the Volga River and the Tver and Krasnodar regions in central and southern Russia, respectively.
The northern Nenets autonomous region ranked as the worst offender, with the bottom 10 also including the oil-rich Khanty-Mansiisk autonomous region in Siberia, the Sakhalin region and the Chukotka autonomous district in the Far East, the Tyumen region, the Orenburg region, the Yamalo-Nenets autonomous region, and Kemerovo, Irkutsk and Kostroma regions.
The index is based on data from the State Statistics Service, said Evgeny Shvarts, Director of Conservation Policy at WWF Russia.
Six regions from the top 10 were also among the poorest 20 regions on per capita income in the first half of 2011, the latest period for which official statistics are available. Six of the ten worst performers ranked in the top 10 of richest regions over the same period.
Regions that topped the rating did not necessarily put much effort into sustainable development, scoring high because of their geography and insufficient industrial development, Shvarts conceded.
But if the index becomes annual as the authors hope, regions rising or falling in the rating will reflect authorities’ environmental efforts or lack thereof, Shvarts said.
The study comes complete with a crowdsourced map of environmental problems, available at http://ria.ru/ecorating/ and open to all concerned citizens across the nation.
The idea can have long-ranging effects, given the massive popularity enjoyed by a similar grassroots map of electoral violations maintained during the last election season by Golos independent watchdog. The map, Kartanarusheniy.org, garnered more than 13,000 reports between the parliamentary vote in December and the presidential poll in March, though next to none were confirmed in court.
Reports about environmental violations will be checked to ensure they are not used for political manipulation, the authors said. Environmental scandals often turn political in Russia, the prime example being the lost battle for the now-partially demolished Khimki forest, which started the career of opposition leader Yevgenia Chirikova.
The freshly launched map comprised only 15 complaints as of Tuesday afternoon, including an oil spill in Omsk region and a bark beetle rampage in a Moscow region pine forest.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
We have witnessed the total defeat of western Ukraine, Western nationalists and the West in general, which made the unfortunate decision to support the anti-government activity. They failed to realize that the collapse of Yanukovych means the collapse of Ukrainian unity. They set fire to their own home and planted a time bomb under Ukraine’s territorial integrity.