State Duma debates a controversial bill that would force NGOs funded from abroad to declare themselves “foreign agents”.© RIA Novosti. Grigoriy Sysoev
MOSCOW, July 6 (Marc Bennetts, RIA Novosti)
Russia’s parliament debates on Friday a controversial bill that would force non-governmental organizations (NGOs) funded from abroad and engaged in political activity to declare themselves “foreign agents”.
The draft law has met with fierce opposition from critics who say the term “foreign agent” is a near synonym for “spy’ in Russian and would lead to the discreditation of human rights groups.
NGOs would also have to publish a biannual report of their activities and carry out an annual financial audit. Failure to comply with the law could result in four-year jail sentences and/or fines of up to 300,000 rubles ($9,200) for members.
A Kremlin source told RIA Novosti earlier this week that the law could be approved by both houses of parliament this month and enter into force this fall.
The country’s oldest rights organization, the Moscow Helsinki Group, has said it will close down its offices rather than comply with the law. Russia’s Public Chamber also said on Thursday that it would not support the bill - which has also been criticized by the Kremlin’s own rights council - in its current form.
President Vladimir Putin said earlier this year that the United States was pumping millions of dollars into NGOs to try to influence the results of elections in Russia.
The bill was proposed by United Russia lawmaker Alexander Sidyakin, the author of recent legislation that sharply increased fines for violations of regulations governing protests.
“There is an entire network of NGOs whose financing is suspicious from the point of view of its provider,” Sidyakin said in a statement on the United Russia website this week.
But Sidyakin rejected allegations that the term “foreign agent” was associated by most Russians with espionage in an exclusive interview with RIA Novosti on Thursday.
“I think the idea that ‘foreign agent’ means ‘spy’ is more of a hangover from the Soviet period in which our parents grew up,” he said. “I don’t think younger generations see the expression this way. We should try to get over Cold War terminology. I believe there is nothing insulting in this term.”
Sidyakin singled out the independent election monitor Golos as an example of what he said were attempts by the United States to “affect Russian politics,” citing at a parliamentary committee hearing on Wednesday the “$2 million given to the organization in 2011 to dirty the Russian authorities.”
Golos, which monitors alleged election violations in Russia, freely admits to receiving funding from abroad and members have said Russian businessmen are afraid to donate for fear of repercussions.
Veteran human rights activist Lev Ponomaryov, of the For Human Rights organization, told RIA earlier this week the proposed law was an attack on the entire Russian civil liberties movement.
“This is a liquidation of the human rights movement in Russia.” Ponomaryov said. “We will not obey this law if it is adopted. We will not register as foreign agents.”
Moscow Helsinki head, Lyudmila Alexeyeva, said this week she would appeal to the U.S. Congress and the European parliament to add the authors of the bill to a visa blacklist drawn up in connection with the death of lawyer Sergei Magnitsky in a Moscow pre-trial detention center in 2009.
The move saw United Russia deputies sign up en masse to become co-authors of the bill.
"We decided to join him as co-authors," United Russia parliamentary faction chief Andrei Vorobyov told journalists.
U.S Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reportedly discussed the law with members of Russian NGOs while on a visit to St. Petersburg last week.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- moistWhats controversial?14:13, 06/07/2012Whats controversial? If implemented, the law will bring Russia fully in line with the US and €USSR regimes, which have similar laws regulating foreign interference in domestic affairs. But then again, thats not in line with western living-in-the-90´s stick & mace policy towards Russia.
- lmDouble standards14:37, 06/07/2012As I said before these Russian NGO’s and oppositionist they were all crying for Western standards to be adopted into Russia, now the Government is doing so they have a problem.
Bear in mind similar laws do exist in other countries but for some reasons the oppositionist keep quite.
If we were to look back they made a lot of noise when the confrontation involving the police and demonstrators took place, but when the same thing happens to demonstrators in the US and EU they keep quiet.
So they servants of their pay masters, another point if one is been paid to do a job who’s rules are they going follow their boss simple no need for a rocket scientist to know this?