- EU Ministers Call For ‘Clear and Firm' Response Over Syria - Reports
- Germany Joins Supporters of Declaration For Action Against Syria - Minister
- Obama Administration to Brief Congress on Syria Sept. 9 - Media
- US Plans ‘Significantly Larger’ Strike on Syria – Reports
MOSCOW, September 8 (RIA Novosti) - A senior Russian lawmaker and the US ambassador to Russia have discussed a possible US operation in Syria on Twitter.
The discussion between Ambassador Michael McFaul and Alexei Pushkov, the head of the Russian State Duma international affairs committee, started Saturday when Pushkov commented on a tweet from Samantha Power, the US ambassador to the United Nations.
Power wrote Friday that “the costs of not taking a targeted military action in Syria are far greater than the risks of the limited but necessary measures” that the US president outlined. Pushkov replied that that was “exactly the argument the Bush administration used in order to explain its aggression against Iraq” in 2003.
McFaul joined the conversation and said Pushkov’s analogy was “false,” as “unlike 2003, no one doubts that the regime has weapons, they used them, and we will not invade.”
Pushkov replied that his analogy was correct as “[President] Bush was looking for a pretext to invade Iraq, [President] Obama is looking for a pretext to bring down [Syrian President] Assad.”
But McFaul told him that Obama was “not looking to bring down Assad,” but instead sought “to defend the international norm of no use of chemical weapons.”
The unrest in Syria began in March 2011 and later escalated into a civil war. More than 100,000 people have been killed in the conflict so far, according to UN estimates.
The US Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted Wednesday to give US President Barack Obama the authority to use military force against the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad in response to an alleged chemical weapons attack last month.
Russia has urged all sides in the Syrian civil war to use diplomatic means to end it.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- bielecAnother lie15:33, 08/09/2013Quote: - But McFaul told him that Obama was “not looking to bring down Assad,” but instead sought “to defend the international norm of no use of chemical weapons.”
This is a B.S. You cannot defend the international norm by violating and breaking international law.
Besides, just like in the case of Iraq, the whole story is based on lies. Already in September 2000, PNAC has targeted Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, and North Korea as a goal for the "new American Century." The reasons are well known - strategic location, energy resources, and pipelines. Americans have used terrorists to start illegal wars of conquest and are still using terrirists to continue them.
McFaul should stop insulting our intelligence with his primitive lies. Nobody believes the U.S. propaganda anymore, just like nobody believes the zionist narrative of the Middle East conflict.
Image Galleries: Hungry Hippos, Tiny Tamarins and Other Animal News
Infographics: First Russian Smartphone
Russia has surged ahead on the foreign policy stage, but this is not enough to remain a great power. The tough-minded policies and masterful diplomacy of Russia’s leadership have maximized the country’s position in the world, and are now the main source of its international influence and prestige. Russia’s foreign policy in the next decade depends entirely on what happens at home.