- Russian MP Says Obama ‘Clones’ Bush in Drive For War
- UK Should Wait for Results of UN Probe in Syria – Russia
- US Gathers Int’l Support for Possible Syria Military Action
- US Using ‘Unproven Excuses’ For Armed Action in Syria – Moscow
- US Blames Assad Regime for Syria Chemical Weapons Attack
- Moscow to Washington: No 'Past Mistakes' in Syria
MOSCOW, August 29 (RIA Novosti) - US President Barack Obama has said he has not yet decided what Washington’s response will be to the alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria.
“I’ve not made a decision. I have gotten options from our military, had extensive discussions with my national security team,” Obama said in an interview with American evening TV news program PBS Newshour on Wednesday.
“I think we all understand terrible things have been happening in Syria for quite some time, that the [Bashar] Assad regime there has been killing its own people by the tens of thousands,” he said.
“Although I have called for Assad to leave and make sure that we got a transitional government that could be inclusive in Syria, what I’ve also concluded is that direct military engagement, involvement in the civil war in Syria, would not help the situation on the ground,” Obama said.
“So we’ve been very restrained, although diplomatically, we’ve been very active; we’ve been providing a lot of humanitarian aid to people who’ve been displaced by the war,” he told the news program.
“But what I also said was that if the Assad regime used chemical weapons on his own people, that that would change some of our calculations,” he said.
Western powers are considering armed intervention in the two-year civil war after hundreds of people were killed last week in the Syrian capital Damascus in an apparent nerve gas attack that the Syrian opposition claimed was performed by government forces.
The Syrian government quickly denied the allegations and said it had evidence of rebel groups using chemical weapons.
“We have not yet made a decision, but the international norm against the use of chemical weapons needs to be kept in place. And nobody disputes - or hardly anybody disputes that chemical weapons were used on a large scale in Syria against civilian populations,” Obama said.
“We do not believe that, given the delivery systems, using rockets, that the opposition could have carried out these attacks. We have concluded that the Syrian government in fact carried these out. And if that’s so, then there need to be international consequences,” he told PBS Newshour.
A UN team of chemical weapons investigators started working in Damascus last week. The team is expected to visit three sites of alleged chemical weapons attacks, including the one last week in Ghouta, an eastern part of the city.
Obama also said he was ready to collaborate with Russia in an effort to cope with the crisis in Syria.
“We’re prepared to work with anybody - the Russians and others - to try to bring the parties together to resolve the conflict,” he said.
Western countries could launch an attack on Syria within days, Reuters reported Tuesday, citing sources who attended a meeting between US envoys and Syrian rebels.
The United Nations Security Council has so far not authorized any military intervention in the Syrian crisis. Moscow, along with Beijing, has previously vetoed three UN Security Council resolutions condemning Syrian President Bashar Assad's government. Russia has urged all parties to the conflict to use diplomatic means to resolve it.
Russia has been Syria's most important ally during the civil war. Moscow has sent to Damascus some weapons that it said were being supplied under previously agreed deals.
Russia harshly criticized the United States on Tuesday for allegedly using “unproven excuses” to justify military action in Syria and said Moscow was “seriously disappointed” by Washington’s decision to put off a bilateral meeting to discuss the crisis.
In a phone conversation on Wednesday requested by the British side, UK Foreign Secretary William Hague informed Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov of a British-proposed draft UN resolution authorizing “the necessary measures” to protect Syria’s civilians.
But Lavrov told Hague that it was necessary to wait until UN experts finished their probe into claims that chemical weapons had been used in Syria.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- M1chael1Do not start World War III just for geopolitics sake08:22, 29/08/2013This is insane folly. If one nuclear missile goes off in this bombardment, then all of them will go off and the entire northern hemisphere will be inhabitable for at least 50 years. Just because a clique of unelected bankers want to play God in this case is simply disgusting because their underground bunkers will also be destroyed when the volcanoes underneath them ignite. So don't do it. Regards, Michael Benson
- realguyso what is russia's response?11:23, 29/08/2013american liberal fascists want to conduct war..whether russia opposes or not...they don't want their beloved military lying idle instead of killing some "backward primitive reactionaries in middle east".
russia's response at time of iraq and afghanistan was muted and i don't think it will change now
- bielecTo President Obama:11:54, 29/08/2013You said, "Hardly anybody disputes that chemical weapons were used on a large scale in Syria against civilian population"
Assad had no reason and would gain nothing by attacking civilian population. There is no motive on his part.
I would not call the foreign mercenaries, terrorists, and armed rebels a "civilian population." These people have been committing outrageous atrocities that target civilians in order to provide pretext for Western military intervention that has been planned since the PNAC document of September 2000. There is a clearly documented motive here.
The entire world knows about it, history will clearly state it, people are not stupid. We know that the real reason why NATO supports Syrian rebels is security of Israel's criminal expansion and the pipelines.
Please tell these clowns in London and Paris to stop lying. We remember the Downing Street memo affair.
And please be assured that we are truly counting on your honesty and integrity. If you send your military to this illegal war, you should return the Noble Peace Prize or it should be revoked.
- bielec(no title)12:00, 29/08/2013Barak, this might be your moment in our shameful modern history. Do the right thing, deliver the "change" that you promised. It's this decision that will determine whether history will call you a good guy or a bad guy.
Image Galleries: Track-and -Field Athlete of the Year Yelena Isinbaeva
Infographics: Russia – Ukraine Gas Dispute
New ties between Russia and Japan would mark not only a breakthrough in their relations but also a significant shift in Northeast Asia’s political dynamic. Both are secondary players in a region overshadowed by an increasingly assertive China, which has not hesitated to push against the boundaries of its neighbors.