- Russian Shipyard Confirms Delivery of 3 Nuclear Subs in 2013
- Russia’s Third Borey-Class Sub Blessed for Sea Trials
- Russia Starts Third Borey-Class Sub Test
- Later Borey Class Subs to Carry Only 16 Missiles – Source
MOSCOW, September 7 (RIA Novosti) – Russia has put trials of two nuclear subs on hold following an unsuccessful launch of a Bulava submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) on Friday, a Russian defense ministry spokesman said on Saturday.
“The day before, a Bulava SLBM was fired toward the Kura test site in Kamchatka [in Far East] during state trials of the Alexander Nevsky nuclear-powered submarine in the White Sea,” the spokesman told journalists, adding that the rocket experienced a malfunction in one of its systems on the second minute of the flight.
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu ordered to halt state trials of the Borey-class Alexander Nevsky and the Vladimir Monomakh submarines, designed to carry Bulava, and to hold five additional launches of the troubled SLBM, the spokesman said.
A state commission led by the Russian Navy Commander Adm. Viktor Chirkov will investigate the reason for the unsuccessful launch.
The Alexander Nevsky submarine was expected to be handed over to the Navy on November 15, while the other Borey-class sub, the Vladimir Monomakh, will join the fleet in mid-December, Russia’s Sevmash shipyard chief Mikhail Budnichenko said in early July.
However, the commissioning of both of those submarines depends on the success of the Bulava test launch. The spokesman did not elaborate on how the failure would affect the schedule.
The three-stage Bulava carries up to 10 MIRV warheads, has a range of over 8,000 kilometers (5,000 miles) and is designed for deployment on Borey-class nuclear submarines.
With Friday’s failure, eight of 19 or 20 test launches of the troubled Bulava have been officially declared unsuccessful. However, some analysts suggest that in reality the number of failures is considerably higher.
Despite several previous failures officially blamed on manufacturing faults, the Russian military has insisted that there is no alternative to the Bulava.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- LocoIvan'in reality the number of failures is considerably higher.'15:23, 07/09/2013As a result, if ‘…the rocket experienced a malfunction in one of its systems at the second minute of… flight…’ one could reasonably speculate that the ‘malfunction’ occurred somewhere between the second and third stage.
If so, then this would explain the cessation of trials because the missile failed in the navigation phase. Unfortunate, because with a DECLARED ‘at best' success rate of 60% and the LOFTY claims of being capable of delivering ‘…six to ten independently targeted HYPERSONIC MANEUVERING nuclear warheads, which CAN CHANGE their flight trajectory’s (sic) ALTITUDES AND DIRECTION’, it would appear that the Russians have solved the complexities of hypersonics, at least 40% of the time.
- LocoIvanCorrection!15:33, 07/09/2013it would appear that the Russians have solved the complexities of hypersonics, at least 60% of the time.
Image Galleries: Wildfires Rage in Russia's Tver Region
Infographics: World War I, 1914-1918
If attempts to drag Russia into a direct military conflict in Ukraine are successful, it would be a catastrophe for Russia comparable to the 1979-1989 Afghan war. There is no direct evidence that the US is trying to bring about a second Afghan war, but indirect evidence abounds.