Yars (RS-24) intercontinental ballistic missile systems© Photo Defense Ministry press service
Topol-M (SS-27 Sickle B) intercontinental ballistic missile system© RIA Novosti. Ilia Pytalev
MOSCOW, June 1 (RIA Novosti)
Russia's mobile ballistic missile launchers are to be fitted with a new camouflage system that will cover their tracks on the ground, making it harder to detect them, Defense Ministry spokesman Vadim Koval said on Friday.
The new equipment not only effectively camouflages missile launchers when deployed, but can also promptly erase tracks on the ground to cover the movements of missile vehicles, as well as creating false trails to mislead enemy surveillance, Koval said.
The new equipment will cut the time required to camouflage the launchers many times over, he added.
The Teikovo ballistic missile site in Russia’s Ivanovo Region will become the first missile unit to be equipped with new advanced camouflage at the end of the year, Koval said.
The unit, based 280 kilometers from Moscow, consists of Topol-M (SS-27 Sickle B) and Yars (RS-24) intercontinental ballistic missile systems.
Other Strategic Missile Forces detachments, including the Irkutsk and Novosibirsk units in Siberia, will also get similar equipment in the future. Topol-M ballistic missile
Topol-M ballistic missile
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- lmLoose lips sink ships.12:15, 01/06/2012Inviting eyes.
- lmJAIL THEIR ASSES GOOD AND PROPPER.15:52, 01/06/2012What a national disgrace of untold shame to the Russia defence sector? It is hard to believe that Russian’s would do such to their own country putting there country at grate risk?
And to add insult to injury there are some Analyst asking question as to why the Government should dig up the pass how ridiculous these analyst are?
I can see at lease Putin has finally put someone strong in charge of the defence infrastructure a future president in the makings should he not cave in to corruptions as others.
The post below was taken from one
Government acknowledges military-industrial complex was plundered
By Itar-Tass World Service writer Lyudmila Alexandrova
MOSCOW, May 29 (Itar-Tass) —— The Russian government has for the first time acknowledged that the country’s defense-industrial complex has been plainly plundered. Law enforcement officials will soon inspect Russia’s largest aircraft-building companies – the Yakovlev Design Bureau and the Tupolev holding company. Their task will be to find out whether large areas of land, originally belonging to them, were auctioned legally.
Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin issued an instruction to probe into the legality of contracts to sell plots of land and real estate after a meeting with the acting chief of the state property management agency Rosimushchestvo Gleb Nikitin. Rogozin said the Russian defense-industrial complex has been “cannibalized.”
The possibility of a revision of the results of privatization has alarmed business people. Analysts keep wondering: what is the reason for digging up the past at a time when more crucial tasks are on the agenda.
Gleb Nikitin reviewed the results of inspections of two largest enterprises in the aircraft-building industry. According to Rosimushchestvo, in Moscow alone the Yakovlev Design Bureau had been granted more than 80,000 square meters of properties. Now virtually nothing is left of that amount – all had been sold up for next to nothing before 2006.
The Tupolev affair is far more interesting. The state had handed over to the company more than 250 square meters of real estate, of which amount only half is left. The land went to outside firms for next to nothing. All of these minor firms belonged to friends and relatives of the then chiefs of the holding company. Now there are supermarkets and apartment buildings.
Rogozin has promised to punish those responsible for selling up the real estate of aircraft-building companies, if the rumors prove true. “We shall look into the claims together with Rosimushchestvo, because now we are confronted with the need for implementing the state program for armaments, but now we see that in the 1990s-2000s the vast potential that had been built up in our great country within the military-industrial complex has been plundered,” he said. “They lost all fear and respect for the law.”
Nikitin’s report was one of the first in a series of memorandums he is going to submit to Rogozin during the year in connection with the investigation of the way the largest defense-industrial complex enterprises were privatized. Earlier, Rogozin had already addressed thievish officials entrenched in Russia’s defense-industrial complex once. It is necessary to track down the real private owners of the military-industrial complex, Rogozin told a conference devoted to defense contract problems in January.
Rogozin ordered drafting a government resolution stipulating the managers of defense-industrial complex enterprises should declare their incomes.
The daily Moskovsky Komsomolets, which has more than once wrote about how the Russian defense-industrial complex lost its territories and production facilities, says examples of this are many. For instance in an article on March 16, 2012 the daily said that the assembly shop of the chief design bureau Almaz-Antei, which had developed all of the country’s air defense systems, now houses a concert hall with Europe’s longest bar counter. There is literally no place where to develop next generation S-500s, the new owners push the designers and manufacturers out into the street, and S-400 radars keep rusting outdoors under the snow and rain. The developers of unique military hardware have to pay businessmen for leasing the buildings that once had been their own.
The very same publication says that this is just a typical picture of what happened to the Russian defense-industrial complex in recent years. Almaz is not the sole one experiencing such problems, the daily says. “Visit any defense industry research institute, and you will see that 50%-80% of its premises have been occupied by car repair shops and striptease bars. A very popular ice show on the TV is filmed inside a hangar of a leading aircraft manufacturer that had once housed an experimental warplanes workshop.
As the daily’s sources have said, Rogozin took note of the publication. He has allegedly initiated a number of inspections of defense-industrial enterprises. For the first time in the post-Soviet years all this land and real estate business in the defense-industrial complex has in fact been declared criminal, the daily says.
Rosimushchestvo suspects that state properties were sold up at grossly understated prices. At random and to whoever cared to lay hands on them. However, now business people feel alarmed about the risk of a revision of the results of privatization. And analysts have been voicing surprise over why the authorities have decided to dig up the past at a time when more crucial tasks are on the agenda. Whole defense industries are in depression.
“No privatization of land or buildings is flawless, if looked at from the standpoint of the market,” said the managing director of Praedium Oncor International, Mikhail Gets, on Business FM radio. “This question has been raised after so many years. It looks rather a political one.”
“The Superjet project is in a critical phase. Ilyushin’s medium haul plane project is practically on the brink of collapse,” said the deputy director of the Center of Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, Konstantin Makiyenko. “The export of combat aircraft has collapsed.” In the meantime, Dmitry Rogozin is itching for a probe into the affairs of the 1990s, into privatization that was held naturally in the realities and under the rules of the 1990s.
Experts offer a very simple explanation for the auditing of the defense-industrial complex. Coping with the current defense contract on the still available industrial base is impossible. So the government had had an idea to gather everything under the same roof again. Possibly, specialists speculate, when the current owners are tracked down, the government will be persuading them to sell the acquired assets.
- SirkoBring Back the Oprichnina...Reopen the Gulags06:24, 03/06/2012This is not news, for anyone who kept track of the geopolitical events of the Yeltsin and indeed the Gorbachev era. That is the main reason the Soviet Union collapsed and the great achievements of the Russian people from 1917 to 1989 where pilfered systematically. If Rogozin investigates this effectively and honestly he will find that the overwhelming majority of the pillagers were American proxies, Israeli proxies or German proxies...Eg. What ethnicity does the surname 'Gets' belongs to??
This is also not new in Russian history. Eg. the purchase of Alaska was never paid for by the U.S. The deal was concocted by a German Count who dealt with the Americans on behalf of the Russian court. The ship with the gold never reached Russia. It conveniently sank in the north Pacific, but I'll bet the gold did not go down with it. Hahahahaha...
Proof positive of the above being true. Cold reason dictates it to be true. Just look at the statement by Gets as to why Rogozin should bother looking into the past when there are so many critical issues today. He is condemned by his own words. The reason we need know the past is to make sure that the thieving rats are punished so that they and others like them can never repeat their criminality...
Image Galleries: Yury Gagarin: A down-to-earth person
Infographics: Sochi Paralympics Medal Count
The project of a Eurasian Union can be considered as a response to the consequences of neo-liberal globalisation, which led to economic and moral decline in the countries forming the Commonwealth of Independent States. It is part of a more general movement in world politics towards regionalisation.