U.S. President Barack Obama walks alongside NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, with other heads of state and government, as they arrive for the official family photo at Soldier Field in Chicago during the NATO 2012 Summit on May 20, 2012© AFP 2014/ Saul Loeb
CHICAGO, May 21 (RIA Novosti)
- U.S. Vows to Go Ahead with Missile Shield, Hopes for Russia's Cooperation
- Iranian Missile Program 'No Threat to Europe Yet' - Miraillet
- Russia Does Not Rule Out Preemptive Missile Defense Strike
- Russia, NATO Missile Talks Reach ‘Dead-End’
- NATO May Decide on Stepping Up Missile Defense in Chicago – Defense Ministry
NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has announced the “first step” of a European missile defense system at a NATO summit in Chicago.
“In Lisbon, we agreed to create a NATO missile defense system. Today, in Chicago, we have declared that a reality,” Rasmussen told reporters on Sunday. “We call this an Interim Capability.”
Following the Lisbon decision, NATO started developing a command and control system capable of connecting missile defense assets provided by individual Allies into a coherent defense, NATO said on its website.
“It is the first step towards our long-term goal of providing full coverage and protection for all NATO European populations, territory and forces. Our system will link together missile defense assets from different Allies - satellites, ships, radars and interceptors - under NATO command and control,” Rasmussen said on Sunday.
“It will allow us to defend against threats from outside the Euro-Atlantic area,” he said.
NATO said on its website: "The Interim Capability features a basic command and control capability which has been tested and installed at Headquarters Alliance Air Command in Ramstein, Germany. Allies will provide sensors and interceptors to connect to the system."
The Full Operational Capability is expected around 2020 or early next decade, it said.
Russia and NATO agreed to cooperate on the so-called European missile defense system at the Lisbon summit in November 2010. NATO insists there should be two independent systems that exchange information, while Russia favors a joint system with full-scale interoperability.
Chief of Russia’s General Staff, Army General Nikolai Makarov said in early May that Russia does not exclude preemptive use of weapons against NATO’s missile defense systems in Europe but only as a last resort.
The projected European missile defense system could by 2020 have the ability to intercept Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles, Secretary of Russia’s Security Council Nikolai Patrushev said earlier.
The United States and NATO agreed to develop the system at a summit in Lisbon in 2010, but talks between Russia and the alliance have floundered over NATO’s refusal to grant Russia legal guarantees that the system would not be aimed against Russia’s strategic nuclear deterrent.
NATO and the United States insist that the shield would defend NATO members against missiles from North Korea and Iran and would not be directed at Russia.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- free_mind50(no title)06:20, 21/05/2012This is why President Putin did not attend this event. NATO has consistently lied o Russia. Now this shield is operational they will feel confident in attacking Syria and Iran. This was a plan in the making for several years, provoking North Korea and Iran into making ballistic missiles, while leaking sabotaged ballistic missile capabilities to both countries in order to build this shield. The west wants to destroy Russia, President Putin knows this, now he must do what Russia has to do in order to survive.
Where is the opposition and their outrage?
This now exposes the opposition and the protests true agenda.
The Russian Federation will respond and the west will throw a hissyfit
Image Galleries: Yury Gagarin: Life of the First Man in Space in Pictures
Infographics: Sledge Hockey
For Russia, Crimea is more than just a territory. It is not for land that Russia is putting all her prestige at stake. This situation is about wounded national pride, history, identity, national phobias, a new Russian nationalism, past relations with the “West” full of real and perceived injuries, and Western hypocrisy.