MOSCOW, May 3 (RIA Novosti)
- Iran Reports ‘Progress’ on Indigenous S-300 Missile
- U.S. Missile Defense in Gulf Signals Strike on Iran – Russian Lawmaker
- Iran Starts Cruise Missile Production
- Paris considers Iran’s missile tests ‘bad signal’
- Iran test-fires second long-range missile in Persian Gulf - TV
Iran’s ballistic missile program does not yet pose a threat to Europe or the United States, France's Director for Strategy Affairs and Defense Policy Michel Miraillet said on Thursday at a missile defense conference in Moscow.
The Euro-missile defense shield being implemented by NATO is aimed at so-called "emerging threat" nations, in particular Iran, which has developed theater range missiles and testing successor designs.
“Firstly Iran’s ballistic missile program threatens neither Europe or the United States,” he said. “Secondly, the Iranian nuclear program is developed for civil applications only. Therefore Russia considers Iran is a risk, not a threat to Europe,” he added.
It would however be a risk to ignore the fact that Iran is rapidly developing ballistic missile technology, he said.
“Iran is increasing its inventory which includes nowadays more than several hundred missiles. Iran is developing indigenously a new type of two-stage solid-fuel missile called Ashura/Seijil. Its theoretical range is 2,200 km. Iran has proved its capability to shoot multiple salvos of missiles having different ranges,” he said.
Iran is developing its program in defiance of UN resolutions, he added.
The U.S. and many Western European nations suspect Iran of developing nuclear weapon capability under guise of its civil nuclear program. Iran has consistently denied the accusations.
In mid-February the U.S. ramped up its sanctions against Tehran, which has four UN Security Resolutions in force against it over its nuclear activities.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
Image Galleries: Removing Protesters’ Barricades in Kiev
Infographics: First Russian Smartphone
Some people are trying to make the reality in Russia at least a bit more humane. The amnesty should apply not only to persons involved in high-profile cases, but also to individuals who are not as well-known. It is better to set free at least some of the individuals who deserve to be released than no one at all.